data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4bbf7/4bbf708c618ff704c5ce5874443b6b14bf56fc05" alt="".jpg)
Does this look weird? Here’s is an old Konica 135mm telephoto lens reversed and mounted to the Lensmate adapter on my G9. I’ve always thought that one lens reversed and mounted on another was one of the strangest setups in photography. How did anyone ever think to do this? Doing this takes a special coupler with one set of threads to match the Lensmate and another to match the filter threads of the reversed lens. The coupler I used was 58mm on one side to match the Lensmate and 55mm on the other side to match the Konica telephoto. Why do this? The idea is to use existing equipment to get extreme closeups. But the G9 already has macro! Why mess with a good thing? Well, let’s try a few shots. (The cable release was extremely useful, thanks, Richard!).
First of all, strictly speaking, none of these shots are true macros.
Macro is supposed to mean a full sized image on the negative. The G9’s sensor is so small that true macro capability might not be very useful; besides, the definition of macro photography has been considerably stretched and is now understood to mean close-ups. Without any accessories, here’s a penny at the closest focus distance for the G9 – about 5/16 of an inch from the front element of the lens when at the shortest focal length (wide angle). The photo is uncropped; it is impressive (click for a larger view) but the subject was very difficult to light because the lens is so close. The light source is pointing almost horizontally through the small space between penny and lens.
First of all, strictly speaking, none of these shots are true macros.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1567b/1567bccb201ef96ab873d565339a29fc0fade6dd" alt="".jpg)
Going to the opposite extreme – again without accessories – he
re’s a shot at maximum focal length (max zoom) and the minimum focus distance (about 20 inches). In this configuration, the subject was much easier to light but the field of view is much more than was desired. Again, the photo is uncropped.
Here’s an uncropped shot taken with the 135mm reversed telephoto. The set
up was almost exactly as shown in the introductory image. The telephoto was set at its widest aperture (f4) and infinity focus. The G9 was at max zoom and minimum focus distance. The penny was moved until it was in focus. The G9 aperture was f8 (in spite of diffraction) to maximize depth of field; however, depth of field is always a problem in macro photography.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e9ab/0e9ab8b060f7d56fa6a23310e578a2d655f3edf9" alt="".jpg)
Here’s an uncropped shot taken with the 135mm reversed telephoto. The set
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/852d1/852d1c3222dfbad905faebb623c329c3f3c8da01" alt="".jpg)
Another strange aspect of the reversed auxiliary lens is that a reversed wide angle lens provides greater magnification than a reversed telephoto. Here’s a shot with a
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0db4f/0db4feced8f6e155921611f8486059304f1de072" alt="".jpg)
Of course, there are simple screw-on closeup magnifier lenses that
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e510/8e510355b9dfec1df2d0c7b886efa554937ade25" alt="".jpg)
The G9 minimum focus distance is about 20 inches at maximum zoom but a fraction of an inch at wide angle. In-between
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab6db/ab6db16a517b05a18f94cb6675e6160ace3a7b26" alt="".jpg)
Lessons learned? The +4 closeup lens is very useful. It provides good magnification and versatility while allowing enough separation between lens and subject to allow variations in lighting. If an extreme closeup – near true macro – is needed, then I’ll use the reversed 40mm Hexanon.
.
6 comments:
I'm not sure if its the quality of the photos or if its the quality of the photos on the website but it looks like you went through a lot of trouble to produce mediocre macro pictures. I have just a plain lens adapter bayonet and a 10x macro HD filter on the end of my G9. I get some amazing macro shots this way. Particularly on from coins. I can take a shot and its amazingly clear. I can't wait till I get a ring light to put on the front. Then I'll be cooking with gasoline.
Congratulations, BigMac, on finding a simple setup that produces the results you want. My purpose for my own mediocre results was simply to illustrate the relative size that can be obtained, the depth of field and to see if a reversed lens was workable and useful for the G9.
Thanks for some fine examples and great new ideas for shooting macros with the G9 or the Canon s-series.
And as always, a bird in hand is worth two in the bush.... :)
Hello
You seem to be someone that might know this - is it possible to configure some kind of set up so I can use my lensbaby with my canon G10?
Kathy, at one time I was also interested in attaching the Lensbaby to the G9 but couldn't find a way to do it.
this is a test to see if I can add comments or ask questions
Post a Comment